![]() |
CAT Tracks for July 27, 2011
NEGOTIATIONS UPDATE |
Off to a sloooooooooooooooooow start...
...a disheartening start.
BACKGROUND:
We felt it best to know who "the players" were before beginning what is always a grueling task.
Below, I shall report what I found to be "disheartening".
But, first, this...
CAT Tracks Editor's Note:
In the coming days, weeks, months...I shall NOT report what transpires in negotiations sessions as I would a BOE or an FOP meeting. It's not against the law, but it could unnecessarily ruffle feathers.
If you will pardon a history lesson...
The Founding Fathers swore themselves to secrecy when they met in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention in 1787. They feared that if individual proposals were to leak out, that various groups would take a position of opposition, refusing to even consider the finished product. The Constitution would be doomed.
Negotiations is a fluid process, involving trade-offs. It is best to see the finished product rather than the work in progress. In the end...something that might have seemed totally unacceptable might be seen in a different light when paired with another item.
So...
As members, you need to place trust in your bargaining team...knowing that nothing is official, there is no new contract until it is ratified by the majority of the members of CAT and approved by the BOE.
You will have your say...
As for me...
...yes, I was there.
In fact, in the absence of the IEA representative who canceled at the last minute due to health problems, I took the lead tonight (hopefully for the last time.)
To get De De O'Shea to take the position of CAT President, I promised to be part of the CAT's 2008 bargaining team...no matter how long it took. (Little did I know it would take 14 months and 30+ sessions!)
Shortly after the 2008-2011 Contract was ratified, I told Madam CAT President that I was done. Yes, I would be happy to remain "on call" (via telephone or across the fence) as a resource...an unofficial "historian". I would offer whatever I could in the way of past practice, providing documentation from my pack-cat files. (Little did I know that we would get a Superintendent of Schools who did not feel bound by contract language, who would freely violate provisions - especially his obsession with Personal Leave and Association Leave.)
So...
My fervent hope that this old CAT would fade away has not been nearly as successful as I hoped. (My former CJSHS colleagues will attest that my presence in those hallowed halls has been rare indeed. I'm trying...REALLY!)
BTW...
My "lingering" is NOT that Madam CAT President can't handle it...she can! As I have noted in the past, Mama CAT fears no one. De De is the face-to-face type. Me, in comparison, I'm the shy and silent type...a letter writer, a paper trail builder.
However, Madam CAT President can't do it alone. Two CATs from the last round of negotiations (Angela Coleman and Suzanne Partridge) have stepped up once more to negotiate. Another CAT from CJSHS has expressed an interest, but is currently having health issues. The IEA representative would make 5...the normal number for the CAT and BOE bargaining teams.
When Madam President told me that the IEA would not have a representative present for tonight's meeting, I agreed to attend. My intent was to play a passive part...the "historian" mentioned above and the note-taker (my roll back when Steve Kohn was CAT's Chief Negotiator.)
As fate would have it, I was handed two documents at the beginning of tonight's session that, well, pissed me off:
After a few minutes of silent reading, with the BOE team looking on, awaiting our response...it just popped out of my mouth: "We need to caucus." The BOE took the cue and left the room for the Superintendent's Office.
With steam pouring from my ears, I turned to Madam President and asked: "Can I do this?"
I went on to explain my ire...and my belief that somebody needed to be the BAD CAT. Since I was "temping", I felt that I was the logical choice. De De and/or the IEA Representative could then make a "fresh start" at the next session.
Well, as we waded through the aforementioned materials, my initial anger subsided. As wrong-headed as the proposals were, it would be counter-productive to risk blowing up negotiations.
So, by the time Madam President summoned the BOE to return to the table, it was a fairly MILD CAT who presented our concerns.
Health Insurance Premium Letter
Since this is getting long, I've decided to make the letter and my comments a separate post.
Negotiation Procedure
Previously known as "Ground Rules for Negotiations"...before the lawyer got hold of it!
I actually dug out the "Ground Rules" we used...for 30+ meetings in 2008. There were a total of 9 rules.
However, when you hire a lawyer by the hour to prepare a list of rules, you get more...in this case, 13.
The one I really liked (sarcasm intended) was the fourth one: "Prior to the beginning of negotiations the parties will agree upon any additional ground rules that will govern the negotiations." I mean...damn. Nine were good enough in 2008 but we are presented with thirteen lawyerly rules tonight...one saying we will develop even more! I don't think so...
Another favorite was: "The Union shall present its proposals, in writing, at the first formal bargaining session. The Board shall present its proposals, in writing, at the second formal bargaining session..."
The first question we innocently asked..."What is tonight? Is this the 'first formal bargaining session'?" The answer from the BOE team..."No. That would be the next meeting. Tonight is the 'Ground Rules' meeting."
That established, the CAT team pointed out that this item would not fly. Reason: CAT submitted its proposal on July 7th. We had no intention of submitting it again at the next meeting. We "suggested" that the BOE submit its proposal at the "next meeting"...the 'first formal bargaining session'. The BOE team agreed.
After we went through their list of rules/procedures, the BOE team caucused...and that was it for the evening. Justin Miller came back on his own and gave us the August 15th date...and then the August 8th date when we voiced objection as to how we could possibly have an agreement by the opening of school.
Now you see my meaning of "disheartening".
Most of you know the acronym DDSS.
I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but, from these meager beginnings, I fear we are in for déjà vu...all over again.
It may be a different year, but it doesn't take Catnip the Magnificent to foretell that there is a long, same old, same old road ahead of us.
We informed the BOE that THAT was NOT our desire...why, in fact, we came up with the "supposal" back in early June, why we have chosen NOT to open language items. We encouraged the BOE (especially in light that they failed to have a proposal ready for tonight) to be sparing in re-opening language items. If they envision "take backs", then they need to realize...THAT process presupposes that they offer something in return. Negotiations is a give-and-take process...not take-and-take.
Especially...
...when your bank account grew from $2.5 million to $3.7 million under the just expired CBA.