![]() |
CAT Tracks for November 14, 2009
COME ONE, COME ALL |
At 3:46 a.m. on a Saturday morning (a real Saturday morning, not one of my retirement "Saturday" mornings), who really gives a CAT's butt about standards, accountability, and comparative test scores?
BUTT...
The article below is about mathematics and science (with a nod to technology and engineering), making it definitely NOT for the general populace...right?
Well, according to the article...WRONG...and YOUR wrong thinking is exactly the problem. You think math and science are just for "smart folks", not the run-of-the-mill dummy...you know, the kind of person who might buy a copy of "Math & Science for Dummies".
Shame on you...
You are part of the problem rather than an agent for solution.
If you want to know what the "problem" in math and science education is in the good ol' U.S. of A, then read the following paragraph from the article...
Bears repeating...
According to our expert-of-the-day, our over-worked and under-paid public school math and science teachers should make sure that "students who are not even moderately proficient in math and science can at least become college-ready in those subjects."
Folks...that would be a miracle, akin to the loaves and fishes.
Ain't happenin' in your lifetime...in the lifetime of Planet Earth!
That's more NCLB B*** S****...where teachers were commanded to take ALL children (don'tcha dare leave even one behind) and make them average or above average, which would defy all mathematical reasoning and scientific proof!
I know, I know...not politically correct. Every child can learn. How can you call yourself an educator (even a former educator) and harbor such uncaring thoughts?
Thank God you retired!!!
(BTW...I whole-heartedly endorse that last sentence!)
Hey, I was a "caring" educator...even taught some math in my time. And, YES, I tried my best to teach math to every last person sitting in my classroom...tried not to leave anyone behind.
However, I shall forever temper my enthusiasm and my goals with a dose of realism...
Commanding every math and science teacher to turn out budding Einsteins is like asking, uh, commanding the gym teacher to make sure that each and every student in her/his class runs a 6-minute mile. And don't let me hear any lame excuses. Remember, we're into miracles here...
You've heard the saying..."This is not rocket science."
Well, actually...THIS IS!!! Ain't that the big concern here...that we are not turning out as many potential rocket scientists as other countries???
Apples and oranges...
Yeah, you've heard that one too.
These other countries - the ones whose students are kicking our students' butts on international tests - do you REALLY think they are trying to teach every Tom, Dick, and Harriet like we are?
I don't think so...
Now, don't get me wrong...I think we are doing the right thing!
All children CAN learn (with a few possible exceptions due to the tragedy of birth, accident, or disease.) We should do as any teacher worth their paycheck does...determine where the students are educationally and take them as far as they are capable of going. That's NOT rocket science and teachers have been doing just that for centuries!
But, turn 'em all into rocket scientists and 6-minute milers...forgetaboutit.
News accounts (and, yes, studies conducted by reputable researchers) of state efforts to "beat the NCLB system"...to "game the system", by lowering standards until they are met so as not to be labeled as failing are common. More notorious, the stories of teachers and administrators "cheating" - altering student answers on state tests.
SHAME, you say!
I don't condone the above, but I understand it. Putting unreasonable demands on people - again, demands that defy mathematical and scientific logic - leads to predictable responses by those people. Impossible demands create contempt among those so asked and a willingness to bend or break the rules.
Goes along the lines of "Ask me a stupid question, I'll give you a stupid answer."
And for my final adage of the day...
Our national obsession with turning everyone - no matter their mental or physical limitations - into rocket scientists is counter-productive.
Instead, we will end up with the proverbial "Jack of all trades, master of none."
Postscript:
Ya know, ever so often I like to take a step back...gaze at the forest rather than be overwhelmed by all those trees.
Ever since I began my teaching career, folks have been messing with education.
My brother is 10 years younger than I. (Hey, do the math...he's a mere puppy at 29 years old!) I remember to this day the gnashing of teeth in the Newell household as one and all gathered around the kitchen table trying to figure out how to answer the 5th Grade math homework problems. (Remember! There is no one correct answer!!!)
The State of Illinois kicked it up a notch circa 1985 with the beginning of standards.
George W. Bush "brings it on" with NCLB.
Barack H. Obama continues the bleeding with "Race to the Top".
Now, quick evaluation...
What has happened to the U.S. standing among developed countries when it comes to comparative test scores over this, say, 50-year period?
Going down, down, down...
Could it be that, maybe, just maybe, the "old ways" were the better ways?
Back in the day, when this old dinosaur roamed...
Even got a name for it...Retro Math!
Don't like that...how 'bout "Classic Math"?
From eSchool News...
How to fix the STEM education 'crisis'
Experts weigh in on teacher qualification, cultural perceptions, and systemic solutions for improving U.S. math and science instruction
By Meris Stansbury, Associate Editor
Primary Topic Channel: Curriculum
"It's a problem that [exists] all across the country," said presenter Steve Robinson.According to experts ranging from White House advisors to leading education organizations, the state of math and science instruction in the United States is in crisis--and only a major overhaul of the U.S. education system will get the nation back on track. In a Nov. 12 webinar, experts discussed several potential ways to bring out these necessary reforms, from changing the perception of math and science to implementing common national standards.
The webinar, titled "America's Math and Science Crisis: How to Fix It," was hosted by the Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media at Columbia University Teachers College. The event started with a list of statistics that suggested the skills of American students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) are declining in relation to students from other industrialized nations.
For instance, recent results from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) suggested the top-performing U.S. high school students were bested by students from at least 20 other nations in math and science.
Presenters also discussed a story from the New York Daily News that was published on the same day as the webinar, reporting that freshman students at the City University of New York could not solve basic algebra problems involving fractions and decimals.
"It's a problem that [exists] all across the country," said presenter Steve Robinson, a member of the White House Domestic Policy Counsel for the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and special advisor to Education Secretary Arne Duncan. "You read about these things all the time."
According to Robinson, the solution to the STEM education crisis revolves around ED's four major areas of school reform: improved standards and assessments (and specifically, promoting common national standards), effective teachers and school leaders, the use of robust data systems to inform instruction, and targeting chronically low-performing schools.
Although there are many funding sources to help encourage high-quality education, Robinson cited the federal Race to the Top Fund, "which I think could specifically help STEM fields," he said.
The fund, which will distribute nearly $5 billion to states that adopt ED's reform goals, is now open for applications. However, there is a "Competitive Preference Priority" that says the fund will give preference to states that focus on STEM education by providing rigorous standards, partnering with national and local STEM organizations, and encouraging underrepresented groups to enter the STEM fields.
Michele Cahill, vice president for national programs and director of urban education at the Carnegie Corporation of New York, a philanthropic organization dedicated to education research and knowledge "diffusion," said it's not just about advancing STEM-capable kids into the STEM fields, but making sure that students who are not even moderately proficient in math and science can at least become college-ready in those subjects.
"It's about making sure the entire country is at a proficient level--and then, of course, making sure a larger number of those students then go on to become advanced in those fields," said Cahill.
Only by aligning school system design with standards and assessments, as well as with effective teaching and human capitol management, can students learn STEM subjects in broad, deep ways that will lead to academic success, Cahill said.
"Right now, maybe there are good standards and assessments, but only little focus on good teaching. Or maybe there's good teaching, but no school administrative support. Everything needs to be stacked and aligned to produce good results," she said.
The Carnegie Corporation is advancing the recommendations of its Institute for Advanced Study, which aims to transform education in the United States so that every student reaches higher levels of mathematics and science learning.
Its report, titled "The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy," focuses on three recommendations to improve STEM education:
The report also details examples of promising practices, resources, and opportunities for action.
Tom Luce, CEO of the National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI), said there are already some best-practice programs in place that states should look to for inspiration.
For example, the Advanced Placement Training and Incentive Program (APTIP) is an approach that reportedly increases teacher effectiveness and student achievement in rigorous math and science courses through training, teacher and student support, vertical teaming, open enrollment, and incentives. The program has been shown to increase the number of students taking and passing AP math, science, and English exams, and it expands access to traditionally underrepresented students, said Luce.
In 2007, nonprofit organizations from 28 states applied to replicate APTIP. NMSI selected nonprofit partners in six states for five-year funding and program management support. NMSI is now replicating APTIP in Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia.
Implementation began during the 2008-09 school year and will expand to include a new group of public high schools each year over the five-year grant period. In 2008-09, NMSI affiliates implemented APTIP in 67 public high schools. This fall, they will be implementing the program in 142 public high schools.
NMSI trained 478 AP teachers in curriculum development, pedagogy, and content in the following subjects: biology, calculus, chemistry, computer science, English language, English literature, environmental science, physics, and statistics. The program resulted in a 51-percent increase in AP exams passed in math, science, and English, and there was a 134-percent increase in the number of AP math, science, and English exams taken for African-American and Hispanic students. There was a 71-percent increase in AP exams passed by African-American and Hispanic students in math, science, and English, and a 55-percent increase in AP exams passed by female students in these subjects.
Luce also promoted the UTeach program, which started at the University of Texas at Austin in 1997 as a new way to prepare high school science, math, and computer science teachers. According to its organizers, the program's strength lies in its collaboration between the Colleges of Natural Sciences and Education.
"UTeach has proven to be so effective that it is now being replicated at universities across the U.S.," said Luce. "Fourteen universities now have UTeach, and 40 more are on the waiting list to replicate this program. It really works."
He continued, "What it really comes down to, especially with UTeach, is that you can't teach what you don't know, and this is a large problem, especially with teachers in lower grade levels." (Read the PDF report: "Knowing Mathematics for Teaching: Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough to Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide.")
Luce also says the STEM crisis needs to be made more public and more people, especially parents, need to realize that an ignorance of math and science concepts is not practical in a 21st-century society.
"Even car mechanics need to have some STEM skills these days," he explained. "I hear all the time people bragging about not being able to balance their checkbooks. You would never hear people bragging about not being able to read. We need a culture shift--we need to let people know it's not OK anymore to lack skills in STEM. Our country, our economy, depends on that."
Luce said students need to be made more aware of what is required to do certain tasks, saying, for instance, that "if kids want to design video games, they need to know that they will have to be proficient in STEM to do that."
All the presenters agreed that beyond more capable teachers, common national standards, and a major cultural shift, STEM concepts also should be integrated into all school subjects, and not just taught separately. This will help students become more aware that math is not just for statisticians, for example, but is used in many different fields.
The presenters also acknowledged that top-performing STEM countries, according to the latest PISA results, have best practices the United States can learn from, although it will take major systemic change on a massive scale to accomplish this--something the presenters said will happen only if there is a sense of urgency at all levels: federal, state, and local.
Michele Cahill, vice president for national programs and director of urban education at the Carnegie Corporation of New York, a philanthropic organization dedicated to education research and knowledge "diffusion," said it's not just about advancing STEM-capable kids into the STEM fields, but making sure that students who are not even moderately proficient in math and science can at least become college-ready in those subjects.