![]() |
CAT Tracks for September 24, 2011
FOR MATH TEACHERS/LOVERS |
The eternal minority group...to infinity and beyond!
From Education Week...
Foiled by the FOIL Method
By David Ginsburg
I observed an Algebra class recently where students were trying to multiply two polynomials, (x + 5) and (3x2 - 5x - 4). And as I roamed the room, I noticed several students who were stuck because they couldn't "FOIL it." Others, meanwhile, did FOIL it and came up with an incorrect product, 3x3 + 15x2 - 4x - 20, as a result (instead of 3x3 + 10x2 - 29x - 20).
The problem, of course, is that the ever-popular FOIL Method only works when multiplying two binomials. Use it when multiplying a binomial by a trinomial, as students did in the above example, and it's as though the middle term of the trinomial never existed.
So, how can we prevent such confusion? Simple. Stop introducing FOIL in the first place, as math coach and consultant Michael Goldenberg wrote in response to my earlier post about another misguided math mnemonic, PEMDAS:
How about it, fellow math educators and curriculum developers? Can we finally put the kibosh on misleading mnemonics like FOIL, and instead stress the math behind a given concept or procedure? In the case of multiplying two polynomials, for example, just show students that it's another application of the distributive property, where each term in one polynomial is multiplied by each term in the other polynomial.
In other words, let's forget about catchy but confusing mnemonics, and stick with FOIL-proof methods for explaining mathematics.
CAT Tracks Editor's Note:
Since I have an opinion about everything else...
...why should this be an exception?
I spent my virgin teaching career doing math.
FOIL? Yep, been there, done that...still got the skill to multiply binomials because of it. I would have no problem teaching it to students today...with the simple advice/direction: Use with binomials only. My only other memory of FOIL was when some ancient "math education reformer" pronounced that FOIL was wrong...that the mnemonic should actually be "FIOL". I was suitably outraged. Like...the end result was the same and the "spelling" of FOIL sure as hell trumped "FIOL"! I mean...how do you even pronounce "FIOL"?
As for "Aunt Sally"? Never heard of the old lady. Somehow I missed this one...so obviously it lacks substance, lacks worth.
So...
Based upon my mathematical worldview and my history as a negotiator, I propose that we compromise...Keep FOIL and show Aunt Sally the door!
POSTSCRIPT:
HA!
Just ran spell check on the preceding "Editor's Note"...it highlighted "FIOL" and suggested "FOIL".
I rest my case!
Hmmm...wonder what would happen if I googled "Aunt Sally"?
And while you're bumping off Aunt Sally, consider crumpling FOIL as well. That one is so egregiously harmful: not only does it cause at least as much confusion as it allegedly alleviates, but it makes students helpless in the face of other cases of polynomial multiplication. Simply throw a binomial times a trinomial at them and watch them try to apply FOIL. Horrid.